"The Moses Controversy"-(new)-(Patterns of Evidence) movie may be seriously flawed. Why? Primarily because of this movie bases at least some of its information, data, and evidence, on the investigation, research, work, and claims by (Dr. Douglas N. Petrovich, Ph.D.). That he wrote in his book title: "The World's Oldest Alphabet: Hebrew as the language of the Proto-Consonantal Script". A brand new (eBook)-(from a peer-reviewed paper) by, author (Ronald Stewart) (both with the same title) "Beyond The World's Oldest Alphabet, Hebrew Memories At Mount Sinai" re-examines some of the claims made by Dr. Petrovich in his book. Which has now taken on a form into the new (Patterns of Evidence) movie "The Moses Controversy". Ronald Stewart has discovered serious issues with the claims in Dr. Petrovich's book. For example; in (2017) in an international interview with "Israeli News Live", Dr. Petrovich explained in great detail "how" he was able to make the discoveries he did. Stating in so many words: "He used his computer's (Power-Point) program magnification tool. Increasing the magnification from 100% to 400%. And that this technique allowed him to manipulate the (photos/images) of the artifacts that he was looking at. Thereby, making drawings until he got them exactly just right. Thus further allowing him to make the remarkable translations and discoveries". However, is this really so? (Allegedly) "No", it is not. Why? First, here is a very little known fact. In (2017), Dr. Nathaniel Greene, Ph.D. decided to "test-out" Dr. Petrovich's 400% computer program technique. To determine if it would do as Dr. Petrovich stated it would. Therefore, Dr. Greene duplicated Dr. Petrovich's technique. So, what were Dr. Greene's results? Dr. Greene's article goes in a lot of detail. However, the bottom-line results were (allegedly) completely opposite then what Dr. Petrovich stated it would do. There was much, much more detail in the "original/as-is" without no magnification added. However, at 400% magnification, the images started breaking up, losing almost all of its resolution, out of shape, distorted, and complete loss of being able to be visually discerned or indistinguishable. Stewart in his book also duplicated Dr. Petrovich's 400% magnification technique is over (4) computer programs at least (75) times and Stewart's results were also the same as Dr. Greene's. However, in an effort to be "more than just and fair" to Dr. Petrovich Author of this new eBook (Ronald Stewart), also duplicated Dr. Petrovich's 400% magnification tool technique in over four different kinds of computer magnification tool programs at 400 % magnification as well. And for two whole days, over and over again, (Ronald Stewart) also came up with the same and/or strikingly similar results as Dr. Green did. Bottom-line: "If you cannot see it, you cannot interpret or translate it"! On the (Sinai-115) stele. Stewart discovered "pre-writing-Hebrew depictions" or maybe not only of the "Pharaoh of Moses", but also a scene that may be the "Israelite Exodus" crossing through the Red Sea". He also provides two similar examples from traditional Mount Sinai. showing a "pre-writing-Hebrew-depiction of what may be "Moses" holding a set of the "10-Commandments " under one arm and his "rod/staff" under the other. To learn much more, order your copy of this (eBook) today for only $6.99 at this URL - https://ian-independent-archaeology-no.godaddysites.com/