ReleaseWire Connect

As the year closes, the Rottenstein Law Group LLP comments on the status of Stryker hip recall lawsuits in both federal and state courts, and offers its insight into the year ahead.

There was no difference in cure rates between pelvic organ prolapse patients who underwent surgery with or without vaginal mesh, according to a newly published study. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a national vaginal mesh law firm, notes that there are tens of thousands of vaginal mesh injury lawsuits pending in federal and state courts across the country.

Stryker hip lawsuits are moving along in federal court in Minnesota. A status conference held on Sept. 9 oversaw the creation of some basic foundations for the federal consolidation of cases, including the selection of plaintiffs’ counsel and a leadership structure, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages those interested in getting more information on Stryker hip lawsuits and side effects to visit this page.

Medical device manufacturer C.R. Bard and a plaintiff settled a vaginal mesh lawsuit originally scheduled to go to trial in New Jersey Superior Court on Sept. 23, according to a Bloomberg report. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, which represents clients in vaginal mesh injury lawsuits, notes that this is the second Bard vaginal mesh settlement in less than a month.

Outcomes from hysterectomies that use the da Vinci surgical robot versus laparoscopic surgery were similar, but with one major difference: patients involved in da Vinci surgeries were at an increased risk of pneumonia, according to a study published in the September 2013 edition of Obstetrics & Gynecology.* The Rottenstein Law Group LLP maintains a website designed to help those looking for more information on filing a da Vinci robotic surgery lawsuit or who are looking for more information on da Vinci side effects.